In Cabin Fever, though, the threat lurking in the woods isn’t a madman with a chainsaw but a flesh-eating virus, which the unsuspecting holidaymakers contract after coming into contact with an unfortunate hermit (well, okay – there are other threats, too, but that’s the main attraction).
CABIN FEVER REMAKE MOVIE
But while college kids today are growing up in a world where Facebook is our primary method of communication and the dream of a decent job post-graduation seems significantly less likely than it used to, there’s apparently one thing that’ll never change: when spring break rolls around, it’s time to head off to a cabin in the woods.Īnd when they get there, of course, disaster awaits, because no matter how much the world changes, some horror movie tropes will always stay the same. In the 14 years between the release of Eli Roth’s original Cabin Fever and Travis Zariwny’s remake, we’ve seen a couple of changes in government, there’s been a global financial crisis, and iPhones were invented. If you’re a fan of B-horror or 1970’s splatter films, stick with Eli Roth’s original vision.Things have changed since 2002. It has no redeeming qualities of which to speak. The 2016 remake of Cabin Feveris the definition of a pointless remake. There wasn’t much to deliberate on when comparing the two versions. Travis Z delivers the flesh-eating gore in the remake with a straight face and the overall effect is flat. But Roth dumps buckets of blood onto the screen with a devilish grin. No, it doesn’t always work in the original. What’s really missing from the remake is Roth’s dark humor. If you are going to remake a film about a flesh-eating virus rooted in 1970’s splatter exploitation movies, you need gross, practical effects. I paused the remake a few times just to check how much time was left.Įven the gore effects feel cheap and underwhelming in this pointless go-around. I still don’t understand how they made almost the exact same film, but made it feel longer and duller. Pacing, tension, and suspense – not in this film. Even minor characters from the original film are stripped of any quirks that made them stand out. I could could distinguish one character from another. Cabin Fever’s original characters weren’t likable, but at least they were memorable. The acting is wooden and devoid of charisma – you will miss Rider Strong. The production values are adequate the camerawork is competent. It’ll be be easier to start by pointing out what the remake does well. In fact, the remake so closely follows the original that one wonders why the filmmakers even bothered.
It somehow accomplishes this feat while following the exact script. Yes, the remake nosedives on every imaginable aspect of film-making. Most importantly, the Cabin Fever remake accomplishes the phenomenal task of being worse than the original. The Cabin Feverremake is directed by someone who credited as ‘Travis Z”. Cabin Fever Remake Will Make You Want To Tear Off Your Own Flesh Cabin Fever is a minor horror entry but it still makes for fun late-night viewing. The characters may feel generic but that’s largely in part to Roth poking a little fun at exhausted horror film tropes. While the performances nothing special, they’re better than what you can often expect in B-films. There is a dark sense of humor permeating the film that separates it from other low-budget horror efforts. The carnage winks knowingly at the audience, never feeling mean-spirited. However, Roth films his violence in a tongue-in-cheek manner. You’ll never look at shaving the same way again after the original Cabin Fever. Roth assaults the audience with several scenes of gut-wrenching violence. Perhaps best known for his contributions to the “torture porn” horror subgenre, Roth uses the flesh-eating virus narrative to maximum effect. You may love or hate these quirks, but you can’t accuse Roth of being boring or generic. The film’s party-loving Deputy Wilson or Dennis, the mullet-haired boy who randomly screams “pancakes” before inexplicably performing kung fu moves in slow motion are the seemingly random bits that make watching Cabin Fever memorable. Much of what makes Cabin Fever work are its idiosyncratic ticks in storytelling and characters. In Cabin Fever, Roth uses the same B-film aesthetics. Roth, like Quentin Tarantino and Rob Zombie, has a fondness for the grindhouse cinema of the 1970s. Yet Eli Roth’s debut film had some idiosyncratic charms that separated it from other horror films at the time. The original Cabin Fever was a divisive film among critics and horror fans.
0 kommentar(er)
